Fourth-party risk

Spec sheet // Glossary // FOURTH-PARTY RISK
Glossary / F / Fourth-party risk
Glossary · Third-party risk

Fourth-party risk

Also called nth-party risk, subcontractor risk

Definition

Fourth-party risk is the risk a firm faces from the suppliers of its suppliers. A bank may contract with a software provider that hosts data with a cloud company. The bank has no contract with that cloud company, yet an outage or breach there can still disrupt the bank's services and customers.

YOUR FIRMDIRECT SUPPLIERSUBCONTRACTORCLOUD HOST
Fig. 1 · Fourth-party risk
DORA RTS on subcontracting · PRA SS2/21 · Interagency third-party guidance
Key rulesDORA RTS on subcontracting · PRA SS2/21 · Interagency third-party guidance
Applies toEU financial entities within the scope of DORA
RegionsGlobal · EU · UK · US
01

How it works

Firms map the subcontracting chain behind each important supplier. Contracts require the direct supplier to disclose material subcontractors, give notice of changes and pass down security, audit and data obligations. Due diligence questionnaires ask which parties support critical services. Monitoring teams track incidents at those subcontractors as well as at the direct supplier.

The risk matters because a failure several links down the chain hits the firm in the same way as a failure at its own supplier. Regulators hold the firm responsible for the whole chain. Under DORA, financial entities must assess subcontracting of ICT services that support critical or important functions, and record those subcontractors in their register of information.

Step 1Map the chainIdentify subcontractors behind each critical or important service.
Step 2Set contract termsRequire notice, approval rights and passed-down obligations.
Step 3Assess subcontractorsReview their location, security and financial strength.
Step 4Monitor changesTrack incidents and new subcontractors through the supplier.
02

The rules

EU · Published 2 July 2025, in force 22 July 2025DORA RTS on subcontractingCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/532 on subcontracting ICT services supporting critical or important functions

Sets what financial entities must assess before and during subcontracting of ICT services that support critical or important functions, including due diligence and monitoring.

EU financial entities within the scope of DORA
UK · 29 March 2021, effective 31 March 2022PRA SS2/21PRA Supervisory Statement 2/21: Outsourcing and third party risk management

Expects firms to assess material sub-outsourcing, require notification of changes and keep the right to object or terminate where subcontracting raises risk.

Banks, building societies, PRA-designated investment firms and insurers
US · 9 June 2023Interagency third-party guidanceInteragency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management (Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC)

Asks banks to consider a third party's reliance on subcontractors during due diligence, contracting and ongoing monitoring across the relationship life cycle.

US banking organisations supervised by the three agencies
03

Common questions

What is the difference between third-party and fourth-party risk?

Third-party risk comes from suppliers a firm contracts with directly. Fourth-party risk comes from the subcontractors those suppliers use. The firm usually has no contract with a fourth party, so it relies on the direct supplier for information, notice of changes and audit access.

Does DORA cover fourth parties?

Yes. DORA treats subcontracting of ICT services that support critical or important functions as part of the financial entity's own risk. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/532 sets the assessment and monitoring the entity must apply to those subcontracting chains.

How do firms find their fourth parties?

Most firms ask suppliers to list material subcontractors in questionnaires and contracts. Some also use external data on supplier technology and hosting. Concentration often appears at this level, when many suppliers rely on the same cloud or data centre provider.