Vendor tiering

Spec sheet // Glossary // VENDOR TIERING
Glossary / V / Vendor tiering
Glossary · Third-party risk

Vendor tiering

Also called vendor segmentation, third-party tiering, criticality tiering

Definition

Vendor tiering is the practice of sorting suppliers into risk tiers based on how critical their service is and how much risk they carry. The tier sets how deep due diligence goes, how often a vendor is reviewed and which contract terms and exit plans apply.

ALL VENDORSINHERENT RISKCRITICALITY SCORECRITICAL TIER
Fig. 1 · Vendor tiering
Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships · DORA Article 28 · PRA SS2/21
Key rulesInteragency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships · DORA Article 28 · PRA SS2/21
Applies toBanks supervised by the Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC
RegionsGlobal · UK · EU · US
01

How it works

Firms score each vendor at onboarding on factors such as the function supported, data access, substitutability and regulatory status. Scores map to tiers, often critical, high, medium and low. A critical vendor gets full due diligence, audits, continuous monitoring and an exit plan. A low tier vendor may need only basic checks and a periodic refresh.

Tiering lets compliance and procurement teams spend effort where risk sits. Regulators do not prescribe tiers. Rules in the UK, EU and US all scale requirements to criticality, using terms such as material outsourcing or critical or important functions. Supervisors expect firms to show why each vendor sits in its tier.

Step 1InventoryList every third party and its service
Step 2ScoreRate criticality, data access and substitutability
Step 3Assign tierMap scores to tiers with set oversight levels
Step 4Apply controlsSet due diligence and review frequency per tier
Step 5Re-tierReassess when services, data or incidents change
02

The rules

US · 9 June 2023Interagency Guidance on Third-Party RelationshipsInteragency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management

Expects risk management commensurate with the risk and complexity of each relationship, with more comprehensive oversight for third parties supporting critical activities.

Banks supervised by the Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC
EU · 17 January 2025DORA Article 28Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA), Article 28

Requires proportionate ICT third-party risk management, with stricter contract, exit and reporting duties for services supporting critical or important functions.

EU financial entities using ICT third-party services
UK · 29 March 2021PRA SS2/21PRA Supervisory Statement SS2/21: Outsourcing and third party risk management

Expects firms to assess the materiality and risk of each outsourcing and third-party arrangement and apply proportionate controls to match.

PRA-regulated banks, building societies, insurers and designated investment firms
03

Common questions

How many tiers do firms use?

There is no regulatory standard. Most firms use three or four tiers, such as critical, high, medium and low. The number matters less than clear criteria, consistent scoring and oversight that differs meaningfully between tiers.

What makes a vendor critical?

A vendor is usually critical when its failure would disrupt an important business service, breach regulatory obligations or harm customers. Access to sensitive data and a lack of substitutes also push a vendor into the top tier.

How often are vendor tiers reviewed?

Many firms re-tier at contract renewal and at least annually for critical vendors. Material changes, such as a new service, a data breach or a change in the vendor's ownership, trigger an immediate reassessment.