Placement, layering and integration

Spec sheet // Glossary // PLACEMENT, LAYERING AND INTEGRATION
Glossary / P / Placement, layering and integration
Glossary · AML

Placement, layering and integration

Also called three stages of money laundering

Definition

Placement, layering and integration are the three stages of money laundering. Placement puts criminal cash into the financial system. Layering moves it through transactions that hide its origin. Integration returns it to the criminal as apparently legitimate wealth. The model helps firms decide which controls catch which activity.

01 PLACEMENT02 LAYERING03 INTEGRATION
Fig. 1 · Placement, layering and integration
FATF Recommendation 3 · POCA 2002, Part 7 · Directive (EU) 2018/1673
Key rulesFATF Recommendation 3 · POCA 2002, Part 7 · Directive (EU) 2018/1673 · 18 U.S.C. 1956
Applies toAll persons in the UK
RegionsGlobal · UK · EU · US
01

How it works

At placement, criminals deposit cash in small amounts, buy assets or use cash-heavy businesses. Banks look for structured deposits and activity that does not fit the customer's profile. Layering uses wire transfers, shell companies, trade invoices and crypto to break the audit trail, and transaction monitoring targets rapid movement and circular flows. Integration shows up as property purchases, loans or investments funded by the cleaned money.

The model matters because each stage leaves different traces. Placement is easiest to detect but often happens outside banks. Layering is the hardest stage to follow and the main focus of monitoring and network analytics. Laundering offences do not require all three stages. A single transfer of criminal property is enough to meet the offence in most jurisdictions.

Step 1PlacementCriminal cash enters the system through deposits or purchases.
Step 2LayeringFunds move through transfers and entities to hide origin.
Step 3IntegrationCleaned money returns as property, investments or business income.
02

The rules

Global · February 2012, regularly updatedFATF Recommendation 3FATF Recommendations, Recommendation 3: Money laundering offence

Requires countries to criminalise money laundering on the basis of the Vienna and Palermo Conventions, covering the widest range of predicate offences.

FATF member and assessed jurisdictions
UK · 24 July 2002POCA 2002, Part 7Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, sections 327 to 329

Makes it an offence to conceal, convert, transfer, arrange for, acquire, use or possess criminal property, covering every stage of laundering.

All persons in the UK
EU · 23 October 2018Directive (EU) 2018/1673Directive (EU) 2018/1673 on combating money laundering by criminal law

Sets minimum rules on the definition of money laundering offences and sanctions across the EU, including self-laundering.

EU member states
US · 27 October 198618 U.S.C. 1956Money Laundering Control Act of 1986

Makes it a federal crime to conduct financial transactions with proceeds of specified unlawful activity to conceal their source or promote crime.

All persons subject to US jurisdiction
03

Common questions

Which stage of money laundering is hardest to detect?

Layering. Criminals spread funds across accounts, companies, jurisdictions and asset types, often at speed. Each transaction can look normal on its own, so detection depends on linking activity across accounts and institutions.

Does laundering always go through all three stages?

No. The model is a teaching tool. Many cases skip or merge stages, for example when criminal proceeds already sit in a bank account. Laws define laundering by dealing with criminal property, not by completing each stage.

What are examples of placement?

Common examples include splitting cash into deposits below reporting thresholds, buying high-value goods or casino chips with cash, mixing proceeds into the takings of a cash-heavy business, and using money mules to pay in cash.