Control testing

Spec sheet // Glossary // CONTROL TESTING
Glossary / C / Control testing
Glossary · GRC and resilience

Control testing

Also called controls testing, test of controls, control assurance testing

Definition

Control testing checks whether a firm's internal controls are designed properly and work as intended over time. Testers review how each control should operate, then take samples of real activity to confirm it did. Results show where risks are not being managed and feed into remediation, risk reporting and board attestations.

DESIGN TESTOPERATING TESTRATE RESULTREMEDIATE
Fig. 1 · Control testing
SOX s404 · PCAOB AS 2201 · UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, Provision 29
Key rulesSOX s404 · PCAOB AS 2201 · UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, Provision 29
Applies toUS-listed companies and their external auditors
RegionsGlobal · UK · US
01

How it works

At a bank, controls range from payment approvals to sanctions screening checks. Testing has two parts. Design testing asks whether the control, if followed, would address the risk. Operating effectiveness testing samples transactions over a period to see if it was actually performed. The first line tests its own controls, compliance and risk functions run independent checks, and internal audit gives assurance.

Failed tests become findings with owners and deadlines. Results feed risk and control self-assessments, regulator reviews and public statements on internal control. US listed companies certify internal control over financial reporting under SOX. UK companies in the commercial companies category declare the effectiveness of material controls for financial years from 1 January 2026, on a comply or explain basis. Continuous automated testing is replacing some periodic sampling.

Step 1Scope controlsSelect key controls linked to material risks
Step 2Test designCheck the control would address its risk if followed
Step 3Sample evidenceTest real activity to confirm the control operated
Step 4Rate resultsClassify each control as effective or deficient
Step 5Track remediationAssign owners and dates, then retest the fix
02

The rules

US · 30 July 2002SOX s404Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, section 404

Requires management to assess internal control over financial reporting each year and, for larger filers, an auditor attestation on that assessment.

US-listed companies and their external auditors
US · 25 July 2007PCAOB AS 2201An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements

Sets how auditors test the design and operating effectiveness of controls over financial reporting.

Auditors of US public companies
UK · 1 January 2026UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, Provision 29UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, Provision 29

Boards declare the effectiveness of material controls at the balance sheet date and describe any that did not operate effectively.

Companies in the UK commercial companies or closed-ended investment funds listing categories, on a comply or explain basis
03

Common questions

What is the difference between design and operating effectiveness?

Design effectiveness asks whether a control, performed as written, would prevent or detect the risk it targets. Operating effectiveness asks whether people or systems actually performed it consistently over the period. A control can be well designed yet fail in operation.

Who performs control testing in a bank?

Under the three lines of defence model, business units test their own controls, risk and compliance functions carry out independent monitoring and testing, and internal audit provides assurance to the board. External auditors also test controls relevant to financial reporting.

How many samples are needed in control testing?

Sample sizes depend on how often a control runs and the risk involved. Annual controls may need one sample, while daily or transaction-level controls need far more. Firms set sampling methodologies in their testing standards, often aligned with audit practice.

What is continuous control monitoring?

Continuous control monitoring uses automated checks on full data sets rather than periodic manual samples. It tests controls such as access rights or payment approvals in close to real time, so failures surface sooner. Firms usually combine it with manual testing for judgement-based controls.