The Court, in a Memorandum & Order found that there were no allegations of any connections between attorney Achraf Safieddine and the defendant banks and that the attorney was not named as a party defendant; thus for several reasons it struck all mention of Safieddine from the Complaint. The order was without prejudice, meaning that the plaintiffs could amend their allegations to remedy the substantive defects and procedural flaws the Court pointed out in the Order, in an Amended Complaint. A copy of the Order appears below.
* Bartlett vs.Societe Generale et al, Case No: 19cv00007 ( EDNY 2019).
This article was originally and first published from : Source RegTech Post simply gathers news around the web around the topic related to regulatory technology to inform and guide decision makers and industry leaders who intend to use or build regulatory technology to transform businesses. All content belongs to their respective authors and no copyright violation is intended. Please email email@example.com or use the contact form for any issues or complaints.